Latvian vs Asian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Asian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Latvians

Asians

Exceptional
Excellent
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,712
SOCIAL INDEX
84.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
56th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Asian Integration in Latvian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,017,505 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.256. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.349% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 349.3 Asians.
Latvian Integration in Asian Communities

Latvian vs Asian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $57,003, a difference of 8.0%), per capita income ($52,649 compared to $50,057, a difference of 5.2%), and median household income ($97,311 compared to $101,681, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($120,301 compared to $119,955, a difference of 0.29%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $63,827, a difference of 0.52%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $53,690, a difference of 1.3%).
Latvian vs Asian Income
Income MetricLatvianAsian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,649
Exceptional
$50,057
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,301
Exceptional
$119,955
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,311
Exceptional
$101,681
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,001
Exceptional
$53,690
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,498
Exceptional
$63,827
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,941
Exceptional
$44,586
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,783
Exceptional
$57,003
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,926
Exceptional
$112,666
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,957
Exceptional
$118,426
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,326
Exceptional
$68,822
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Tragic
26.9%

Latvian vs Asian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.5%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (13.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 1.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Latvian vs Asian Poverty
Poverty MetricLatvianAsian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
14.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Exceptional
26.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.7%

Latvian vs Asian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Latvian vs Asian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLatvianAsian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Good
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%

Latvian vs Asian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.82%).
Latvian vs Asian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLatvianAsian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Exceptional
83.4%

Latvian vs Asian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 9.9%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and family households (62.8% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.13%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.5%).
Latvian vs Asian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLatvianAsian
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
29.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Exceptional
49.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.28
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
26.8%

Latvian vs Asian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.5%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.83%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 7.6%).
Latvian vs Asian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLatvianAsian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Exceptional
91.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Exceptional
57.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
20.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
7.0%

Latvian vs Asian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 55.6%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.4%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.92%).
Latvian vs Asian Education Level
Education Level MetricLatvianAsian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Good
91.4%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Good
89.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.6%
Exceptional
69.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Exceptional
52.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Exceptional
44.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.8%
Exceptional
18.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%

Latvian vs Asian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.66%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Latvian vs Asian Disability
Disability MetricLatvianAsian
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Excellent
46.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%