Latvian vs Moroccan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,200,314 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.076% in Moroccans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 76.3 Moroccans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 16.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $100,138, a difference of 15.8%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $104,488, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $53,256, a difference of 0.90%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $41,872, a difference of 4.9%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $48,838, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 45.4%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 40.0%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.7%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.3%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.5%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 14.7%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 49.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 15.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.0%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.0%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.65%), male disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.9%).