Latvian vs Apache Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,010,989 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Apache within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.901. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.105% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 104.7 Apache.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $34,886, a difference of 50.9%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $84,451, a difference of 42.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $82,184, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $49,395, a difference of 6.9%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $54,668, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 129.7%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 108.3%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 100.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 35.1%), single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 36.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 41.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 101.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 82.0%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 77.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 49.1%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 43.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 6.0%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 9.0%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.4%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 80.7%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 76.2%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 66.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.47%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 54.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 50.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 11.9%), female disability (11.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 16.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.3%).