Latvian vs Immigrants from Nigeria Community Comparison

COMPARE

Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Nigeria
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Latvians

Immigrants from Nigeria

Exceptional
Fair
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,310
SOCIAL INDEX
20.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
263rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Nigeria Integration in Latvian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,611,750 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nigeria within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.147. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Immigrants from Nigeria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 31.9 Immigrants from Nigeria.
Latvian Integration in Immigrants from Nigeria Communities

Latvian vs Immigrants from Nigeria Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $40,339, a difference of 30.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $86,589, a difference of 25.8%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $96,439, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $49,174, a difference of 7.3%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $39,294, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $58,942, a difference of 14.2%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from Nigeria Income
Income MetricLatvianImmigrants from Nigeria
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,649
Tragic
$40,339
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,301
Tragic
$96,439
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,311
Tragic
$81,236
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,001
Poor
$45,030
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,498
Tragic
$51,310
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,941
Fair
$39,294
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,783
Tragic
$49,174
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,926
Tragic
$86,589
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,957
Tragic
$94,804
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,326
Poor
$58,942
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Exceptional
22.7%

Latvian vs Immigrants from Nigeria Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 43.8%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 43.7%), and married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.30%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from Nigeria Poverty
Poverty MetricLatvianImmigrants from Nigeria
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Average
20.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
19.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
18.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
18.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
13.1%

Latvian vs Immigrants from Nigeria Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.9%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.7%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from Nigeria Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLatvianImmigrants from Nigeria
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
11.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.1%

Latvian vs Immigrants from Nigeria Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from Nigeria Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLatvianImmigrants from Nigeria
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
66.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Good
83.0%

Latvian vs Immigrants from Nigeria Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 48.3%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 27.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.6%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.32, a difference of 6.8%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from Nigeria Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLatvianImmigrants from Nigeria
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
43.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
43.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
35.4%

Latvian vs Immigrants from Nigeria Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 3.1%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from Nigeria Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLatvianImmigrants from Nigeria
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Tragic
88.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Tragic
52.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Poor
18.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Poor
6.1%

Latvian vs Immigrants from Nigeria Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 63.0%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 52.9%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from Nigeria Education Level
Education Level MetricLatvianImmigrants from Nigeria
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
92.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Tragic
91.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
89.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
87.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Tragic
84.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.6%
Tragic
63.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Poor
57.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Poor
44.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Fair
36.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.8%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Fair
1.8%

Latvian vs Immigrants from Nigeria Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.43%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.2%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from Nigeria Disability
Disability MetricLatvianImmigrants from Nigeria
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Fair
47.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%