Latvian vs Black/African American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,088,142 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.426% in Blacks/African Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 425.6 Blacks/African Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $73,370, a difference of 48.5%), per capita income ($52,649 compared to $35,564, a difference of 48.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $78,556, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $44,381, a difference of 18.9%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $35,315, a difference of 24.4%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 88.3%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 88.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 85.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 23.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 24.8%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 51.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 49.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 70.1%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 59.8%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 0.060%), family households (62.8% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.27, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 83.5%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 78.6%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 64.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 44.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 10.3%).