Latvian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,437,778 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 18.1 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($120,301 compared to $92,837, a difference of 29.6%), per capita income ($52,649 compared to $41,195, a difference of 27.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $91,462, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $53,722, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $38,644, a difference of 13.7%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $44,462, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 73.1%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 65.0%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.98%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.1%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 35.8%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 25.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 38.9%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 21.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.0%), family households (62.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 143.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 18.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 38.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 43.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 100.1%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 82.9%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 64.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 29.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.1%).