Latvian vs Jordanian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Jordanian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Jordanians
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,589
SOCIAL INDEX
93.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
11th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Jordanian Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,200,471 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.363. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 59.0 Jordanians.
Latvian vs Jordanian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $45,605, a difference of 15.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $99,186, a difference of 9.8%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $109,865, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $51,796, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $64,313, a difference of 4.7%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Jordanian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Excellent $45,605 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Exceptional $109,865 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Exceptional $91,794 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Exceptional $49,632 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Exceptional $58,500 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Exceptional $41,464 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Fair $51,796 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Exceptional $99,186 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Exceptional $109,376 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Exceptional $64,313 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Tragic 26.8% |
Latvian vs Jordanian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.7%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.88%), single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.2%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Jordanian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Exceptional 18.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Good 16.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Latvian vs Jordanian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.2%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Jordanian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Average 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.3% |
Latvian vs Jordanian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.73%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Jordanian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Exceptional 66.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Fair 36.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Excellent 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Average 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Latvian vs Jordanian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.7%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.97%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Jordanian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Exceptional 65.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 29.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 48.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Latvian vs Jordanian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 14.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Jordanian |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Exceptional 8.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Exceptional 57.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Excellent 6.6% |
Latvian vs Jordanian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.7%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.5%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.49%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Jordanian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Excellent 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Excellent 96.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 95.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 93.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.2% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 90.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Exceptional 87.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Exceptional 68.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Exceptional 49.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Exceptional 41.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Excellent 4.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Latvian vs Jordanian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 16.8%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.83%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Jordanian |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |