Latvian vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Latvians

Lithuanians

Exceptional
Excellent
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Latvian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,281,867 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.366. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.334% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 333.6 Lithuanians.
Latvian Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Latvian vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $49,448, a difference of 6.5%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $42,108, a difference of 4.4%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $115,395, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $53,552, a difference of 1.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $112,484, a difference of 3.1%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 3.1%).
Latvian vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricLatvianLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,649
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,301
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,311
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,001
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,498
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,941
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,783
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,926
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,957
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,326
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Tragic
28.7%

Latvian vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.0%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.28%), female poverty (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.46%).
Latvian vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricLatvianLithuanian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.7%

Latvian vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.74%).
Latvian vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLatvianLithuanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Latvian vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
Latvian vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLatvianLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Exceptional
83.6%

Latvian vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 6.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.10, a difference of 0.060%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Latvian vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLatvianLithuanian
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
29.6%

Latvian vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 16.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
Latvian vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLatvianLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Average
6.3%

Latvian vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.0%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (92.0% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.050%), 12th grade, no diploma (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%).
Latvian vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricLatvianLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.6%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.8%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%

Latvian vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Latvian vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricLatvianLithuanian
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%