Latvian vs Peruvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 187,646,215 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.296. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Peruvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 58.4 Peruvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $44,479, a difference of 18.4%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $105,444, a difference of 14.1%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $55,659, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $56,052, a difference of 6.2%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $62,766, a difference of 7.3%), and median household income ($97,311 compared to $90,261, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 35.8%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 28.8%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.0%), single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.7%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.53%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 54.9%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.5%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.20%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%).