Latvian vs Iraqi Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Iraqi
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Iraqis
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,167
SOCIAL INDEX
49.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
183rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iraqi Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,439,277 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iraqis within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.211% in Iraqis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 211.3 Iraqis.
Latvian vs Iraqi Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $42,760, a difference of 23.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $90,764, a difference of 20.0%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $100,658, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,802, a difference of 3.9%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $60,466, a difference of 11.4%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Iraqi |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Fair $42,760 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Fair $100,658 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Fair $83,753 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Fair $46,140 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Average $54,182 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Poor $38,666 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Tragic $50,802 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Poor $90,764 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Fair $99,387 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Fair $60,466 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Poor 26.6% |
Latvian vs Iraqi Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 50.4%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 33.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.7%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Iraqi |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Fair 12.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Fair 9.3% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Poor 11.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Fair 13.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Poor 18.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Tragic 17.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 17.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Poor 17.4% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Good 20.8% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Good 28.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Fair 12.2% |
Latvian vs Iraqi Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Iraqi |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Fair 5.5% |
Latvian vs Iraqi Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.68%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Iraqi |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 76.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Tragic 82.2% |
Latvian vs Iraqi Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.60%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Iraqi |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Average 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 27.6% |
Latvian vs Iraqi Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.1%, a difference of 1.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Iraqi |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Exceptional 57.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Average 19.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Fair 6.2% |
Latvian vs Iraqi Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 52.9%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 40.3%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.81%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Iraqi |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Average 95.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Average 94.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Good 89.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Good 86.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Excellent 66.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Excellent 60.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Good 47.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Good 39.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Average 1.8% |
Latvian vs Iraqi Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 13.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 3.3%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Iraqi |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Fair 11.8% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Fair 11.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Fair 11.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 48.6% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |