Latvian vs Colville Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,977,337 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Colville within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.615. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.206% in Colville. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 205.6 Colville.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $82,474, a difference of 40.6%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $85,792, a difference of 40.2%), and median household income ($97,311 compared to $70,094, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $49,774, a difference of 6.0%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $37,514, a difference of 17.1%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $42,151, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 100.9%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 83.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 80.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 29.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 40.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 42.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 81.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 77.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 73.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 64.3%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 63.4%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.62%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 82.1%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 39.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 33.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 70.2%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 63.1%), and bachelor's degree (46.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 150.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 67.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 10.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.1%).