French Canadian vs Malaysian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,404,312 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 23.1 Malaysians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 12.1%), per capita income ($43,003 compared to $39,194, a difference of 9.7%), and median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $50,772, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $58,244, a difference of 0.46%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $51,615, a difference of 2.1%), and median household income ($82,810 compared to $81,064, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.9%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 24.3%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (22.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (63.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 84.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.5%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 45.3%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 19.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.87%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.5%).