French Canadian vs Immigrants from Sierra Leone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,389,829 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sierra Leone within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Immigrants from Sierra Leone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 31.4 Immigrants from Sierra Leone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 31.0%), householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $66,009, a difference of 13.9%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $42,214, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($43,003 compared to $42,752, a difference of 0.59%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $93,115, a difference of 0.62%), and median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $53,905, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.4%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 30.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.8%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 12.1%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 0.46%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 44.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 64.4%), master's degree (14.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 15.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 49.6%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 49.4%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.2%).