French Canadian vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,263,641 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 29.5 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $52,074, a difference of 21.1%), median family income ($101,634 compared to $118,440, a difference of 16.5%), and median household income ($82,810 compared to $96,490, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.36%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $53,739, a difference of 2.0%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $43,308, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 18.5%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and single male poverty (14.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.49%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 27.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 16.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.38%), currently married (48.0% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and family households (63.7% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.80%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 46.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 34.5%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 36.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.9%), and hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.60%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 7.7%).