French Canadian vs Immigrants from Iraq Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,776,750 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iraq within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Immigrants from Iraq. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 22.2 Immigrants from Iraq.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $89,444, a difference of 4.8%), and per capita income ($43,003 compared to $41,365, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($82,810 compared to $82,594, a difference of 0.26%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $98,201, a difference of 0.91%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $53,384, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.8%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 30.2%), and single male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.37%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 26.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.48%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.26%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 59.5%), bachelor's degree (35.6% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.95%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 63.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 21.5%), and hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 4.0%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 4.4%).