French Canadian vs Immigrants from Barbados Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,160,904 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Barbados within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.489. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Immigrants from Barbados. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 19.6 Immigrants from Barbados.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 57.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $89,394, a difference of 10.8%), and median family income ($101,634 compared to $92,419, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($46,026 compared to $45,816, a difference of 0.46%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $53,163, a difference of 0.93%), and per capita income ($43,003 compared to $41,478, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 54.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 50.2%), and receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.96%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 47.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 42.8%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 50.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 69.7%, a difference of 11.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.9%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.67%), family households (63.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 275.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 83.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 75.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 30.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 64.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 75.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 77.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.9%), and college, under 1 year (64.2% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (35.6% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 0.28%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 94.0%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 61.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 0.37%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.9%).