French Canadian vs Immigrants from Greece Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,751,326 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Greece within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.346. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Greece. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 5.0 Immigrants from Greece.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $51,891, a difference of 20.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $110,103, a difference of 17.5%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $44,976, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $55,727, a difference of 5.8%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $64,636, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 24.6%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.9%), and single female poverty (22.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 34.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 25.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.8%), births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 23.8%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.22%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 87.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 8.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 44.9%), master's degree (14.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 34.6%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.45%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 46.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.0%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.9%).