French Canadian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,355,638 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 2.6 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $65,854, a difference of 13.6%), median household income ($82,810 compared to $90,618, a difference of 9.4%), and median family income ($101,634 compared to $110,011, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $51,259, a difference of 2.8%), median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $56,302, a difference of 2.9%), and median earnings ($46,026 compared to $48,229, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 22.9%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 19.9%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.35%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and family households (63.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 29.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.5%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.11%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and high school diploma (90.9% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 59.7%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.2%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.1%).