French Canadian vs Immigrants from Poland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 292,789,158 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Immigrants from Poland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 52.8 Immigrants from Poland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($82,810 compared to $90,549, a difference of 9.3%), median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $41,630, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $101,065, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $61,041, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $55,474, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 26.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.2%), and single female poverty (22.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 19.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.4%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.16%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (63.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 34.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 54.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.4%), bachelor's degree (35.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.65%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 3.5%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.1%).