French Canadian vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,201,599 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.829. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 36.8 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $61,270, a difference of 5.7%), per capita income ($43,003 compared to $44,987, a difference of 4.6%), and median household income ($82,810 compared to $85,797, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $55,415, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $39,109, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($46,026 compared to $46,916, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.7%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.1%), and receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.84%), female poverty (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 58.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 13.5%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.67%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.97%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 22.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.2%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.24%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 55.6%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.55%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.2%).