French Canadian vs Immigrants from Morocco Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,377,466 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.819. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Immigrants from Morocco. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 27.3 Immigrants from Morocco.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 16.4%), median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $42,229, a difference of 9.9%), and per capita income ($43,003 compared to $46,430, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $102,015, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $54,593, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $97,305, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.9%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 18.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.95%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 19.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 13.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 2.7%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.07 compared to 3.21, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 60.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 50.4%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.4%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.84%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.85%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 63.2%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 38.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.23%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 3.5%).