French Canadian vs Immigrants from Argentina Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,128,602 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Immigrants from Argentina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 16.5 Immigrants from Argentina.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $49,627, a difference of 15.4%), median household income ($82,810 compared to $92,417, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $63,885, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $54,209, a difference of 2.9%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $41,554, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.69%), female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.81%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 40.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 32.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 14.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.64%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 46.7%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.9%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.39%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 52.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 41.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.3%).