French Canadian vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,278,687 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.769. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.148% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 148.2 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $49,173, a difference of 14.3%), median household income ($82,810 compared to $93,971, a difference of 13.5%), and median family income ($101,634 compared to $114,553, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $52,540, a difference of 0.25%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $60,350, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 21.7%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 20.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 30.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 23.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 23.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 67.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 54.8%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 52.8%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 64.0%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 39.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 9.0%).