French Canadian vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,867,845 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 27.1 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 22.5%), median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $45,607, a difference of 20.0%), and per capita income ($43,003 compared to $36,690, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $56,768, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $50,132, a difference of 5.1%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $35,114, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.9%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 24.5%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.78%), single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 55.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.99%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 25.9%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (63.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 65.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 57.9%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 57.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (13.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.7%).