French Canadian vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 388,509,184 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Finns within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.459. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 31.3 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $59,535, a difference of 2.7%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $51,827, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $54,721, a difference of 0.0%), median earnings ($46,026 compared to $45,940, a difference of 0.19%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $38,173, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.2%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.58%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.84%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 8.7%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.29%), average family size (3.07 compared to 3.09, a difference of 0.66%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 10.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.15%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in college, under 1 year (64.2% compared to 66.9%, a difference of 4.1%), college, 1 year or more (57.8% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 3.5%).