French Canadian vs Menominee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,447,617 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Menominee within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 9.7 Menominee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $76,903, a difference of 28.8%), median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $42,581, a difference of 28.5%), and median family income ($101,634 compared to $79,563, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $47,907, a difference of 10.0%), householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $51,719, a difference of 12.1%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $33,894, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 56.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 55.5%), and receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 121.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 60.3%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 28.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 76.7%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 51.6%), and births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 4.5%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and average family size (3.07 compared to 3.30, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 50.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 32.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 38.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 31.6%), and bachelor's degree (35.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 23.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), disability (13.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.0%).