French Canadian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 306,812,193 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 18.7 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 11.2%), median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $42,084, a difference of 9.5%), and median household income ($82,810 compared to $90,026, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $53,185, a difference of 0.97%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $99,232, a difference of 5.9%), and median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $58,008, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.6%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.1%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.47%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.80%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 36.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 21.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 16.6%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.25%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 60.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.0%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.65%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.77%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 61.4%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 38.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.54%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 6.1%).