French Canadian vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,773,214 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 58.0 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $34,974, a difference of 23.0%), median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $45,538, a difference of 20.2%), and median family income ($101,634 compared to $85,050, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $51,022, a difference of 3.2%), householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $53,420, a difference of 8.5%), and median household income ($82,810 compared to $74,217, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 74.9%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 48.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.7%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 24.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 33.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 25.8%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 4.1%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and family households (63.7% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 28.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.44%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 140.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.3%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 53.1%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 29.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.4%).