French Canadian vs Immigrants from Honduras Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,626,360 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Honduras within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.332. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Immigrants from Honduras. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 20.7 Immigrants from Honduras.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($101,634 compared to $83,618, a difference of 21.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $77,328, a difference of 21.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $82,697, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $48,267, a difference of 9.1%), median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $34,647, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $51,888, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 72.9%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 55.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 3.6%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 36.2%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 35.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.6%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.41%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.76%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 49.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 111.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 30.7%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 56.5%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 36.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.7%).