French Canadian vs Yakama Community Comparison

COMPARE

French Canadian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

French Canadians

Yakama

Average
Poor
5,542
SOCIAL INDEX
52.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
175th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yakama Integration in French Canadian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,555,316 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.165% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 165.4 Yakama.
French Canadian Integration in Yakama Communities

French Canadian vs Yakama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $33,009, a difference of 30.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $76,226, a difference of 22.9%), and median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $45,002, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $56,234, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $54,321, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $86,992, a difference of 13.9%).
French Canadian vs Yakama Income
Income MetricFrench CanadianYakama
Per Capita Income
Fair
$43,003
Tragic
$33,009
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,634
Tragic
$83,932
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,810
Tragic
$72,225
Median Earnings
Fair
$46,026
Tragic
$39,107
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,722
Tragic
$45,002
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,436
Tragic
$33,354
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,672
Exceptional
$54,321
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,694
Tragic
$76,226
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$99,093
Tragic
$86,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,975
Tragic
$56,234
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
23.7%

French Canadian vs Yakama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 110.8%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 87.9%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.4%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 18.1%).
French Canadian vs Yakama Poverty
Poverty MetricFrench CanadianYakama
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
16.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
18.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Tragic
25.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.6%
Tragic
22.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
15.9%
Single Females
Tragic
22.2%
Tragic
28.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
18.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Tragic
21.4%

French Canadian vs Yakama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 88.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 69.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.8%).
French Canadian vs Yakama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFrench CanadianYakama
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.3%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
7.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
22.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
18.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.3%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
8.1%

French Canadian vs Yakama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
French Canadian vs Yakama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFrench CanadianYakama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.0%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.2%
Tragic
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.1%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.3%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Poor
82.5%
Tragic
80.6%

French Canadian vs Yakama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 75.4%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 39.2%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.3%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and family households (63.7% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 8.8%).
French Canadian vs Yakama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFrench CanadianYakama
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
30.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.07
Exceptional
3.45
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.0%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.4%
Tragic
40.3%

French Canadian vs Yakama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 95.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 50.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.6%).
French Canadian vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFrench CanadianYakama
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.9%
Exceptional
64.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
31.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
12.9%

French Canadian vs Yakama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 136.8%), master's degree (14.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 48.9%), and bachelor's degree (35.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
French Canadian vs Yakama Education Level
Education Level MetricFrench CanadianYakama
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
95.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
94.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
91.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
90.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Tragic
86.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
85.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
82.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
80.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
74.5%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.2%
Tragic
52.6%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.8%
Tragic
46.2%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.9%
Tragic
32.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.6%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.1%
Tragic
9.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.3%

French Canadian vs Yakama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 88.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 24.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.35%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
French Canadian vs Yakama Disability
Disability MetricFrench CanadianYakama
Disability
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Males
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
1.00%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Tragic
29.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.0%
Tragic
51.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%