French Canadian vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,431,665 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Comanche within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $85,787, a difference of 15.5%), median family income ($101,634 compared to $88,556, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $82,152, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $54,922, a difference of 5.6%), median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $35,661, a difference of 7.8%), and median earnings ($46,026 compared to $41,519, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 40.7%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 35.8%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.49%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 67.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.4%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.33%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.3%), master's degree (14.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.5%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 51.2%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.8%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.2%).