French Canadian vs Immigrants from South Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,882,316 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Immigrants from South Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 29.4 Immigrants from South Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $51,465, a difference of 19.7%), householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $67,234, a difference of 16.0%), and median household income ($82,810 compared to $95,800, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $51,705, a difference of 1.9%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $42,508, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.7%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.37%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.76%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 40.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 17.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.040%), currently married (48.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 49.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 37.1%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.070%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and 11th grade (94.0% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 62.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 9.6%).