French Canadian vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,177,663 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Crow within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 4.4 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 47.3%), per capita income ($43,003 compared to $31,729, a difference of 35.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $74,257, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $35,266, a difference of 9.0%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $47,012, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $49,234, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 125.0%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 98.0%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 81.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.7%), single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 25.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 39.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 225.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 214.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 212.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 47.3%), average family size (3.07 compared to 3.82, a difference of 24.4%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.5%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 40.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 32.5%), bachelor's degree (35.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 28.3%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.3% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.26%), 10th grade (95.3% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 99.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 51.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (13.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.8%).