French Canadian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,172,169 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.667. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 40.1 Immigrants from Lithuania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $51,361, a difference of 19.4%), median household income ($82,810 compared to $96,836, a difference of 16.9%), and median family income ($101,634 compared to $118,053, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.9%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $55,028, a difference of 4.5%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $43,317, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 29.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 25.8%), and single male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.080%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 17.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.5%), births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 24.0%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.30%), currently married (48.0% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 25.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.9%), master's degree (14.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 31.2%), and bachelor's degree (35.6% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 48.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 39.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 4.7%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.0%).