French Canadian vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 443,073,327 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Immigrants from Eastern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 10.4 Immigrants from Eastern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $49,316, a difference of 14.7%), median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $43,309, a difference of 12.7%), and median household income ($82,810 compared to $93,051, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $55,572, a difference of 5.5%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $62,693, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 23.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 19.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.49%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 21.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 24.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.060%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and family households (63.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 73.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.3%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 30.6%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.22%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 58.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.7%).