French Canadian vs Immigrants from Romania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,096,728 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.248. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Romania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 5.0 Immigrants from Romania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $49,463, a difference of 15.0%), median household income ($82,810 compared to $94,222, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $104,713, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.9%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $55,522, a difference of 5.4%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $42,718, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 24.2%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 19.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 20.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 23.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.81%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 45.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 33.9%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.6%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 58.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.5%).