French Canadian vs Immigrants from England Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 373,043,860 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from England. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 3.3 Immigrants from England.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $48,844, a difference of 13.6%), householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $65,715, a difference of 13.4%), and median household income ($82,810 compared to $92,098, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.64%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $51,817, a difference of 1.7%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $41,277, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.1%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.50%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.050%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.49%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 10.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.63%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.49%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 32.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and 11th grade (94.0% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 37.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.1%).