French Canadian vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,399,378 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 14.9 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($82,810 compared to $104,796, a difference of 26.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $118,056, a difference of 26.0%), and per capita income ($43,003 compared to $53,806, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $57,123, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $69,872, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 31.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 27.9%), and single male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.46%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 36.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 37.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.3%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.36%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 72.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 66.2%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 63.6%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 57.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.61%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 84.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 47.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.1%).