Mongolian vs Swedish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,365,951 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.167. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.128% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 127.7 Swedes.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 10.5%), median female earnings ($42,542 compared to $39,421, a difference of 7.9%), and per capita income ($49,173 compared to $45,750, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $52,986, a difference of 0.85%), householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $62,736, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,602 compared to $106,377, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 30.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 24.3%), and family poverty (8.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.95%), single female poverty (20.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 25.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.0%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.78%), family households (62.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.10, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 93.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 31.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 7.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 50.6%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.7%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 31.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.7%).