Luxembourger vs Swedish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,400,144 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.536. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.212% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 211.8 Swedes.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 7.3%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $52,986, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $62,736, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,663 compared to $45,750, a difference of 0.19%), median earnings ($47,640 compared to $47,851, a difference of 0.44%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $39,421, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 6.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.16%), poverty (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.10 compared to 3.10, a difference of 0.090%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 26.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 13.0%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.020%), ged/equivalency (88.6% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.0%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.92%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 4.5%).