Alaska Native vs Swedish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,339,826 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.173. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to a decrease of 19.2 Swedes.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 20.4%), per capita income ($39,558 compared to $45,750, a difference of 15.7%), and median male earnings ($49,711 compared to $57,445, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $52,986, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($38,202 compared to $39,421, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $62,736, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 69.8%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 60.9%), and family poverty (10.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 7.1%), single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (8.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 74.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 68.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 19.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 51.1%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.7%), and births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.92%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.10, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 156.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 15.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.1%), bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 33.1%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 2nd grade (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 86.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 37.0%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and female disability (12.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.8%).