Houma vs Swedish Community Comparison
COMPARE
Houma
Swedish
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Houma
Swedes
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Swedish Integration in Houma Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,092,258 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.366. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.058% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 57.9 Swedes.
Houma vs Swedish Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $106,377, a difference of 47.6%), median family income ($76,188 compared to $108,499, a difference of 42.4%), and median household income ($62,575 compared to $88,524, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $57,445, a difference of 13.7%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $52,986, a difference of 19.5%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $47,851, a difference of 22.9%).
Income Metric | Houma | Swedish |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,996 | Exceptional $45,750 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,188 | Exceptional $108,499 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $62,575 | Exceptional $88,524 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,949 | Excellent $47,851 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,547 | Exceptional $57,445 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $30,343 | Fair $39,421 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,356 | Excellent $52,986 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,044 | Exceptional $99,136 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $72,093 | Exceptional $106,377 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,822 | Excellent $62,736 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 38.7% | Tragic 29.4% |
Houma vs Swedish Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 105.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 93.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (24.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 86.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 30.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 51.9%), and single mother poverty (43.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 53.1%).
Poverty Metric | Houma | Swedish |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Families | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Tragic 20.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.2% | Average 20.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 24.9% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 13.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.5% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.8% | Good 20.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 26.7% | Average 16.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.5% | Excellent 28.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Houma vs Swedish Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 87.4%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 53.6%), and unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Houma | Swedish |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.4% | Excellent 7.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Houma vs Swedish Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 23.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Houma | Swedish |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.5% | Average 65.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 72.7% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Exceptional 44.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Exceptional 78.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.2% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.5% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 83.7% |
Houma vs Swedish Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 57.0%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 44.3%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Houma | Swedish |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Exceptional 49.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.10 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Exceptional 50.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.6% | Fair 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 46.6% | Exceptional 29.6% |
Houma vs Swedish Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 68.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 55.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 43.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Houma | Swedish |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Exceptional 93.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Exceptional 61.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Houma vs Swedish Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 106.1%), professional degree (2.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 104.9%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 98.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.4%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Houma | Swedish |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.4% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.7% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 97.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 95.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 94.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 93.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 92.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 75.0% | Exceptional 88.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 47.6% | Exceptional 68.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 41.2% | Exceptional 62.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 21.4% | Good 39.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 7.9% | Good 15.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.2% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 0.96% | Excellent 2.0% |
Houma vs Swedish Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 66.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 63.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 16.6%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 17.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.2%).
Disability Metric | Houma | Swedish |
Disability | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 16.9% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 18.7% | Fair 11.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.3% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.3% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.3% |