Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Scotch-Irish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,070,629 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.342. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.032% in Scotch-Irish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 31.8 Scotch-Irish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 24.6%), per capita income ($39,827 compared to $42,563, a difference of 6.9%), and median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $53,658, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $49,039, a difference of 0.59%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $37,383, a difference of 1.7%), and median earnings ($43,998 compared to $44,924, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 33.4%), family poverty (10.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 23.1%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.10%), single female poverty (22.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 29.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.5%), married-couple households (43.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (62.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 53.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 20.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 116.7%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 51.6%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 30.4%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.9%).