Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Scotch-Irish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,027,620 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Scotch-Irish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to a decrease of 18.2 Scotch-Irish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 15.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $49,039, a difference of 7.3%), and median household income ($85,054 compared to $80,972, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,848 compared to $59,447, a difference of 0.67%), median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $53,658, a difference of 0.79%), and median family income ($101,354 compared to $99,591, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 24.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 22.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.98%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.2%), currently married (46.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 0.31%), family households (65.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 50.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 14.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 58.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and college, under 1 year (63.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (45.0% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 0.68%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 33.1%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 29.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.58%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.1%).