Immigrants from Lithuania vs Scotch-Irish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,596,233 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.072% in Scotch-Irish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 72.4 Scotch-Irish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,361 compared to $42,563, a difference of 20.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,149 compared to $89,969, a difference of 20.2%), and median household income ($96,836 compared to $80,972, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.47%), householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $59,447, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $49,039, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 33.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 29.3%), and single female poverty (17.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.1%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 19.9%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.080%), currently married (48.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 44.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 29.6%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 28.4%), and bachelor's degree (44.6% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.21%), 11th grade (94.1% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 35.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 34.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 5.4%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.9%).