Native Hawaiian vs Scotch-Irish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,441,634 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Scotch-Irish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 Scotch-Irish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $59,447, a difference of 19.5%), householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $49,039, a difference of 12.5%), and wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,027 compared to $44,924, a difference of 0.23%), median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $53,658, a difference of 2.6%), and median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $37,383, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 21.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 20.9%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and family poverty (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 22.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.4%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.11, a difference of 10.4%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.2%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.6%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 0.76%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.7%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.1%).