Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Scotch-Irish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 347,033,684 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish within Immigrant from Eastern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.241. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Scotch-Irish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Africa corresponds to a decrease of 11.0 Scotch-Irish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 24.7%), median female earnings ($40,644 compared to $37,383, a difference of 8.7%), and median earnings ($46,969 compared to $44,924, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($53,713 compared to $53,658, a difference of 0.10%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,467 compared to $97,073, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,458 compared to $89,969, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 26.2%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 19.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.81%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.88%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.3% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.1%), married-couple households (42.9% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.2%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 47.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 29.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 66.9%), master's degree (16.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 43.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 37.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.30%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 7.7%).