Immigrants from South America vs Scotch-Irish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,910,793 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish within Immigrant from South America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.636. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Scotch-Irish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South America corresponds to a decrease of 12.0 Scotch-Irish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 15.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,268 compared to $49,039, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($39,643 compared to $37,383, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,151 compared to $59,447, a difference of 0.50%), median male earnings ($53,962 compared to $53,658, a difference of 0.57%), and median family income ($100,414 compared to $99,591, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 33.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 33.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.76%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.4%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 24.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.2%), currently married (45.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 65.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 42.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 21.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 35.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 69.0%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (58.4% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 0.86%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 44.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 40.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.4%).