Immigrants from Moldova vs Scotch-Irish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,619,440 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.119% in Scotch-Irish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 119.2 Scotch-Irish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $49,039, a difference of 14.5%), median female earnings ($42,304 compared to $37,383, a difference of 13.2%), and median household income ($91,446 compared to $80,972, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $59,447, a difference of 5.9%), wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and median family income ($109,975 compared to $99,591, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 31.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and single female poverty (18.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 27.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 21.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.090%), currently married (48.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 44.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 24.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.0%), master's degree (16.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and bachelor's degree (41.6% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.7% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 11th grade (93.7% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Scotch-Irish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 49.4%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 27.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.030%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.1%).