Australian vs Peruvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,932,051 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.444. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in Peruvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 89.5 Peruvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $44,479, a difference of 17.1%), median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $55,659, a difference of 12.9%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $105,444, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $56,052, a difference of 4.3%), householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $62,766, a difference of 6.6%), and median household income ($96,490 compared to $90,261, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.8%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 22.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.67%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.3%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.17%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.59%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 47.7%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.5%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.3%).